|
|
Start ETM TRT Home ETM Tutorial
Training
SHOM
Publications Store About
This summary is supported by the ETM TRT SHOM educational series which
is provided in its both The purpose of the use
of criminal violence by an offensive trauma manager (OTM) and also referenced
herein as terrorist organization is to attack and damage the individual and
systemic human ontology of its adversary. That strategic application of
traumatic events is contrived to decimate or otherwise over time destroy the
targets’ individual and collective, but primarily existential aspects of
identities, which form the ontology’s most significant element. It pertains
to the ongoingness/continuity and thus survival of both the referenced
identity component, first, and the entity in its entirety, second. Achieving
that goal also renders, proportionately, the targeted polity’s operational
management and other decision making capacities’ less capable of
self-protection. That is, the entity’s will to resist/fight defend-itself is
decimated directly relative to the amount of existential identity sundered by
the event. Conversely,
Etiotropically engineered and administered strategic restoration of those
specific and critical-to-survival aspects of identity re strengthens will.
Simultaneously, that strengthening re renders the OTM’s method moot, to mean
eventually making the process whereby heinous events are created for the purpose
of achieving political ends, obsolete. Moreover and stressing
non-linear aspects of this thesis, where destruction to identity can spread
systemically throughout a collective, like a family, organization, local
community, region, nation or civilization, it can also be
rescinded/reversed/restored the same. When done strategically Etiotropically,
then, restoration of a single identity can spread to the restoration of the
targeted collective’s, again, same; but this occurs depending on the
facilitation, including with emphasis the capacity to constrain
collectively-influencing exogenous variables. To bring about that
restoration of individual and collective identity and will requires understanding
and responding properly to three predominate stratifications of SHOM theory
pertaining to perpetrator application of criminal violence to targeted
communities. 1.
Terror perpetrator organizations
create a systemically installed pathological bond between themselves and
their targets – survivors. Addressing the bond properly (Etiotropically AND
strategically) can reverse the depreciating psychopathology on the target and
turn the intended psychological destruction back upon the perpetrator: the terrorist organization’s management,
and NOT JUST upon the immediate or direct killers who may otherwise already
be dead. 2.
Psychological trauma caused by
criminal violence creates individual and systemic (meaning individually and
collectively experienced and behaviorally manifested) natural survival
responses from targets that present in two and apparently contradicting
manifestations. That is, the surviving targeted individual and system will
simultaneously attempt to a.
reconcile the internally retained
trauma and b.
Maintain the trauma intact. 3.
That non-linear or paradoxically
inscribed ─ to mean drawn on and in to the victim psychology by the
traumatic event ─ conflict
presents individually and systemically behaviorally as attempts to help one’s
self and at the same time support the perpetrator against themselves - the
Survivors. The latter, manifested behaviorally as denial in the minimum and
Stockholm syndrome in the more maximum prospect, is the primary feature of
offensive trauma management upon which perpetrators rely for the success of
their strategic use of criminal violence – terror. Where that apparent
paradox presents, it can be exploited with the proper tools to,
strategically. support the constructive element of the response to help the
individual self and system and to preclude the destructive response that
supports the perpetrator. 4.
Certain cultural (exogenous)
variables incorporated as helping methods will support destructive
manifestations against constructive ones. Cordoning off those interfering
variables during application of the management response facilitates both a.
reconciliation of the
terrorism-caused trauma for the surviving individuals and system, and b.
emphatic ─
to mean unencumbered by the referenced psychological
distractions (denial and Stockholm syndrome) caused by the trauma ─
address of the perpetrator. ©
1979-2011 |
|
Summary:
Etiotropic Theory of the Neuro-Endocrine Molecular Substrate of Individual
Human Ontology Methods-Security |
