|
™
|
Start
ETM TRT Home ETM Tutorial
Training
SHOM
Publications Store About The
purpose of the use of criminal violence by an offensive trauma manager (OTM) and
also referenced herein as terrorist organization is to attack the individual
and systemic human ontology of its adversary. That strategic application of
contrived traumatic events are contrived to decimate or otherwise over time
destroy the targets’ individual and collective identities, which is an
element of that ontology. Achieving that goal results in the targeted polity’s
operational management and other decision making capacities’ through reduction
of will of the attacked system to defend itself. Restoration of such
identities strengthens will and renders the OTM’s method moot and eventually
obsolete. Rendering
that restoration of individual and collective identity and will requires
understanding and responding properly to three predominate stratifications of
SHOM theory pertaining to perpetrator application of criminal violence to
targeted communities. 1.
Terror perpetrator organizations
create a systemically installed pathological bond between themselves and
their targets – survivors which when addressed properly can reverse the depreciating
psychopathology and turning the intended destruction back upon the perpetrator
(the terrorist organization’s management, not just upon the immediate or
direct killers, who may already be dead). 2.
Psychological trauma caused by
criminal violence creates individual and systemic (meaning collectively
experienced and behaviorally manifested) natural survival responses from
targets that present in two and apparently contradicting manifestations. That
is, the surviving targeted individual and system will simultaneously attempt
to a.
reconcile the internally retained trauma and
b.
Maintain the trauma intact. That conflict presents individually and
systemically behaviorally as attempts to help one’s self and at the same time
support the perpetrator against themselves - the Survivors; the latter is the
primary feature of offensive trauma management upon which perpetrators rely
for the success of their strategic use of criminal violence – terror. Where
that apparent paradox presents, it can be exploited with the proper tools to support
the constructive element of the response to help the individual self and
system and to preclude the destructive response that supports the
perpetrator. 3.
Certain cultural (exogenous) variables
incorporated as helping methods will support destructive manifestations
against constructive ones. Cordoning off those interfering variables during
application of the management response facilitates both a.
reconciliation of the terrorism-caused
trauma for the surviving individuals and system and b.
emphatic
─ as in unencumbered by trauma ─
address of the perpetrator. ©
1979-2011 |
|
|
