|
™
|
Start
ETM TRT Home ETM Tutorial
Training
SHOM
Publications Store About General
Behavioral clinical counseling and therapeutic methodological responses to
trauma and other clinical matters are not comparable to SHOM’s structured
Etiotropically-focused methodologies. General Behavioral clinical counseling
methods are Nosotropically or symptom focused which can lead to convolution
of problem analysis into stigmatizing concepts of wider ranging personality
disorder and the consequent address of myriad personal problem issues not
necessarily related to those created by the traumatic event. Moreover, those
diversions can routinely become inspired by different goals that are attended
by even more diffuse assessment procedures that engage myriad problem areas
not directly related to the primary address of trauma, diverting the trauma
management focus further from its principal task of reversing trauma etiology.
The additional focuses then are attended by implementation procedures that
can and routinely do conflict with each other, in the process not just hampering
achievement of the original goals, but interfering with traditional non
clinical management modalities that operate task achievement oriented systems
like businesses, crisis management, law enforcement and military
organizations. The
general Behavioral counseling approach then causes not only devalued views of
clinical ineffectiveness, but of legitimate complaints of incompatibility between
non clinical- and those general clinical-based managerial concepts, philosophies
and etc. Stigmatization of the clinical response to trauma is the net effect;
neither task-based managers nor trauma affected targets want to use the
remedy. In fact, military, law enforcement and emergency medical services
personnel routinely refuse to use the general Behavioral counseling approach because
it encumbers career advancement due to the attendant stigmata,
culminating in continued Offensive Trauma Managers (OTMs) who initiated the
events achieving their goals: reduction of the efficacy of the opponent’s
capacity to manage its organization and the inevitable decline in morale ─
the will to persevere to achieve the mission. Rationalizations that denigrate
the value of the original planning or mission achievability predominate, turning
the entire operation into controversy and the experience of futility. That is
how OTMs defeat consensually managed societies. Differently,
the clinical components of SHOM™ are distinguished in their structural
designs to maintain direct focus on the primary issue: addressing the
traumatic event’s influence on human ontology for the purpose of reversing the
trauma etiology caused by the event. That Etiotropically-focused discipline integrates
homogeneously with task-based systems. They are not encumbered by the
conflicts attending referenced general Behavioral and otherwise
Nosotropic-focused counseling methods. Because symptoms are not required to
trigger the clinical response, the concept of disorder does not attend the
remedy: no stigma, no confusion no conflict for professional careers. Trauma’s
individual and systemic influences are removed, task-based management is not
encumbered, and will to persevere in achieving the original mission (meaning individual
and system morale) is restored and maintained. The Offensive Trauma Manager’s
goals are precluded from being met by SHOM’s Etiotropically-focused response.
When the purposes of the OTM’s terrorism model are shown to be invalid
concepts, and thus the goals of incapacitation of target management to be
unachievable, the use of terrorism as a viable management approach-weapon
will be abandoned. To
take an example, Islam’s tenets require that concepts that it employs for
advancement of its ideology must be effective. Otherwise they are seen as detrimental to Islam
and axiomatically must not be used. Note that this body of work is well
versed in the concepts or supposed differences between the terms Islam and
radical or fundamentalist Islam. The work purposefully and without
reservation ─ but accords explanation where
appropriate (see the section heading “Applications”) ─
uses the term “Islam.” ©
1979-2011 |
|
|
